| |
Newsroom
| 2009
Press Clips | | | |

| |
|
Union says city can save millions by slashing
deals with private contractors
By MONICA
THOMPSON Special to the AmNews March
13, 2009
District Council 37, the city's largest municipal employee
union, recently issued a white paper, "Massive Waste at a Time of Need,"
slamming the city for seeking to close a $4 billion budget gap with tax hikes,
cuts to health, education, police, fire and sanitation services and layoffs even
as it throws $9 billion of its $60 billion budget to fund "a shadow government"
of private contractors and outside consultants.
The DC 37 study insists
that work done by the private sector often costs much more than work done by public
employees. It charges that the "shadow government" uses a parallel workforce
of more than 100,000 employees hired without the "merit and fitness"
examinations and background checks required of civil service workers and that
city employees are better trained, more responsible and more costeffective. The
study identifies about $130 million in savings the city could realize by cutting
spending on outside contracts that use over-paid consultants and over-priced contractors.
"While this study points to specific areas where decisive action
can provide immediate savings," said DC 37 Executive Director Lillian Roberts,
"I hope that in this era of change it will also spur public officials and
the media to shine light on the 'shadow government,' work with us to identify
and cut the waste, and save the taxpayers hundreds of millions of dollars.
"Since
July 2005, funding for the city's contract budget has increased rapidly, climbing
to a record high of $9.2 billion for more than 18,000 contracts. The amount the
city pays for these contracts is equivalent to 15 percent of the city's tax-levy
budget and more than 46 percent of the city's controllable spending," Roberts
added.
Focusing on just 10 contracts at eight city agencies, the union's
report insists the city could save over $130 million if the work that was being
farmed out was performed by city workers. For instance, the city could save $21.6
million by end-ing contracts with computer consultants doing non-specialized technical
work that can be done by computer professionals employed by the Department of
Information Technology and Telecommunications (DoITT) and other agencies.
Using
job training participants (JTPs) in the Transitional Jobs Program to do custodial
work, the union says, could save the city $14.5 million if it ended ending contracts
with outside custodial services. The union insists this would also have the added
bonus of giving JTPs a path toward stability and fulltime jobs while also adding
to the city's base of taxpaying residents.
Other savings cited in the report
include some $51 million by ending the Department of Homeless Services' practice
of utilizing "per diem" hotels and motels to house an increasing homeless
population without a legal contractual relationship, as required by the city's
procurement rules. In fact, the union recommends the city instead refer homeless
families to the New York City Housing Authority at the "per diem" rate
for privately owned shelters.
The release of the DC 37 report has been
followed by a number of City Council hearings, including one by the General Welfare
Committee, chaired by Bill de Blasio and a joint hearing by the Education and
Contracts committees chaired, respectively by City Council Members Robert Jackson
and Letitia James.
City Hall spokesperson Stu Loeser slammed the report
as overstating "the cost of functions that could be brought onto the municipal
side, while simultaneously understating the full cost to taxpayers of having career
municipal employees." Loeser criticized the report for ignoring the "cost
of health benefits, training and pensions" that the city seems to have targeted
lately.
"Our members have an expertise and a knowledge base no outsider
can match," Roberts said. "Our white paper shows dollar for dollar just
how valuable our members are compared with the inefficiency of consultants and
management. There are also the issues of transparency and accountability that
are byproducts of this type of process.
"Six years ago, when we brought
this type of waste to light in a white paper, 'We Can Do the Work,' the Bloomberg
administration cut back on outside contracts and saved the city $175 million.
But, since fiscal year 2005, the contract spending has soared by 36 percent, from
$6.7 billion to $9.2 billion. In the computer field, we have seen an explosion
of 147 percent in contracting costs.
"No responsible government can
in good conscience cut vital services and lay off hard-working public employees
while real savings are within reach," Roberts concluded.
| |